I have observed that my corrupted flash drives had rather slow transfer rates to begin with.
For example, out of a 32 GB Transcend normal-size SD-HC card (undamaged transfer rate: 17 MB/s) and a 64 GB MicroSD-XC card (transfer rate: 80 MB/s), both roughy 5 years old, the former has several corrupt videos, while the latter has no corruption, at least so far. It has nothing to do with HC or XC, but presumably the quality of internal components and/or error management, how ever it works.
Many rather slow flash devices also did not lose data in several years, including an ~13 year old 1 GB SD card (brand name: Formula 1), but a high constant (normal) transfer rate is a marker of good quality, because flash storage needs to be of good quality to reach such transfer rates in first place.
I have observed that my corrupted flash drives had rather slow transfer rates **to begin with**.
For example, out of a 32 GB Transcend normal-size SD-HC card (undamaged transfer rate: 17 MB/s) and a 64 GB MicroSD-XC card (transfer rate: 80 MB/s), both roughy 5 years old, the former has several corrupt videos, while **the latter has no corruption**, at least so far. It has nothing to do with HC or XC, but presumably the quality of internal components and/or error management, how ever it works.
Many rather slow flash devices also did **not** lose data in several years, including an ~13 year old 1 GB SD card (brand name: *Formula 1*), but a high constant (normal) transfer rate is a marker of good quality, because flash storage needs to be of good quality to reach such transfer rates in first place.
(post is archived)