I think the feminine version of tyranny, which we are starting to see now, with the likes of Ardern, Clinton, AOC, Trudeau, etc, will be much worse than the masculine form. The feminine form of tyranny is a kind of deformed motherhood, a horrible overbearing mother determined to protect us from all possible harm, whether we like it or not. We will get C.S.Lewis' vision: > Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals. Eventually, the world will have to learn (perhaps again, maybe this has happened long ago in the forgotten past) that a society that vests significant political power in women ends in horror. They are built (designed if you will) for the task of bringing children into the world, and raising them from new born to about the age of 8-10, where after fathers should take over the majority of the formation of their character (if not before then). Women are hard wired to be hyper-attentive to the needs of infants. Which is great, if you're dealing with infants. But if you apply that approach to adults, you get a hell of rules and censorship and no risk and no fun and no adventure. A horrible, boring, safe prison to rot in.