Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

Yes, America has the most guns, but most gun owners don’t do mass shootings, so that number is irrelevant. The fact is, in most countries, if a criminally insane person is intent on acquiring a firearm, he can do it. And yet, these weird mass casualty events only happen in America.

>Yes, America has the most guns, but most gun owners don’t do mass shootings, so that number is irrelevant. The fact is, in most countries, if a criminally insane person is intent on acquiring a firearm, he can do it. And yet, these weird mass casualty events only happen in America.

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

The insane idea that a 'gun free zone' will stop a criminal.

[–] • 2 pts

Have you ever walked into one of those signs? Shit hurts.

[–] • 3 pts

The better question is why does it seem that almost all these shooters are know to enforcement agencies yet manage to fall through the cracks.

[–] • 2 pts

Why are you asking me?

[–] • 2 pts

And yet, these weird mass casualty events only happen in America.

False.

[–] • 0 pt

It's like breivik didn't happen

[–] • 2 pts

Because America is a big stumbling block to global communism and 'they' are trying to disarm us (these are Operation Gladio black ops by professionals).

[–] • 2 pts

Cause we cant throw faggots off the roof.

[–] • 1 pt

Assuming the problem with shootings is the availability of guns is a very ignorant view.

Guns have existed in this country since the first settlers arrived. Guns have been available on this continent since long before the country itself existed. That means that gun availability has been a constant.

The real question that needs to be asked by anyone who is serious about trying to prevent them is; what changed? While gun availability has been a constant these shootings are a relatively recent phenomena. So if access to guns is not the variable that has changed, What is?

Solving the problem requires honest introspection to find the actual cause. My question is simple. If guns have been a constant, what variable has changed?

[–] • 1 pt

The dialectic should really be drawn between “rational skepticism” and “kookery.”

I'm glad to hear that.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Perhaps most importantly: America has a mass intelligence apparatus with a well-documented history of running utterly amoral psychological operations against their own population

And the said intelligence agencies together with FBI instigate the attacks in the first place...