WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

156

You used to literally be censored and banned from social media for saying the virus came from a Chinese lab, and we are now entering into a paradigm where you will get banned for saying the virus came from bats. Facebook actually had to announce that they would no longer be banning people for saying the virus came from a lab. Eventually, you will be banned for bringing up the fact that the media used to say it was from bats. It’s full “we’ve always been at war with East Asia.” Total information control. Imagine being inside the head of a person who is capable of thinking this is reasonable.

>You used to literally be censored and banned from social media for saying the virus came from a Chinese lab, and we are now entering into a paradigm where you will get banned for saying the virus came from bats. Facebook actually had to announce that they would no longer be banning people for saying the virus came from a lab. Eventually, you will be banned for bringing up the fact that the media used to say it was from bats. It’s full “we’ve always been at war with East Asia.” Total information control. Imagine being inside the head of a person who is capable of thinking this is reasonable.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I’m no fan of Anglin in general, but he actually has impressed me with his research on the fraudulent PCR tests. Not many people know about the cycle threshold and how they can be made to test positive for meaningless cellular debris.

Anyway, the virus is fake. There was never any new virus discovered. It’s the only way any of this actually makes sense. Whenever the media presents two options (1. bat virus or 2. lab virus) the truthful answer is almost always on a plane of existence above those two options; in this case, there is no virus. By letting you argue about where “the virus” came from they are simply reinforcing the idea that there is a virus.

Which there is not.