Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

238

https://dailystormer.su/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Screen-Shot-2021-05-02-at-10.56.25-AM.png

Christine Lampard was riding dirty for decades before she decided to settle down at the age of 42 and have a science experiment pregnancy.

https://dailystormer.su/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Screen-Shot-2021-05-02-at-10.56.25-AM.png >Christine Lampard was riding dirty for decades before she decided to settle down at the age of 42 and have a science experiment pregnancy.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 3 pts

That could be very true. I've also heard that if you just keep having kids it's easier to conceive when you are older. So first one at 20, tenth at 40 and it's easy, where first at 40 is nearly impossible.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Three boys with three different men, her character judgement aside, she had me at 19, the middle at 39, and the youngest at 47.

[–] • 0 pt

As long as they're all white she is better than most.

[–] • 1 pt

I really believe this as I've seen it a lot anecdotally, women who have had babies before 35 have few issues having more after 35 and even 40+, it seems the younger they start the older they can go to, like the body is practised at it. But first baby after 35 is very hard, and if they do get one after 35 subsequent conceptions and live births will be significantly harder to achieve. It's like the body doesn't know what to do or it gave up hope, thinking all that reproductive stuff is useless.

I've only had cursory searches but I've yet to see any real evidence or anyone of any authority or expertise spouse this theory.