WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

756

The legal system was designed for men, who operate on facts. When you add women into the mix, and start allowing their feelings to enter into the court, you are going to get chaos.

>The legal system was designed for men, who operate on facts. When you add women into the mix, and start allowing their feelings to enter into the court, you are going to get chaos.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

They have done more to protect rapists and discredit real allegations than anyone.

Why do they need a free pass for slander, rape and pedophilia anyway?

Why was this such a priority for them?!

[–] 1 pt

In the USA, we set a precedent (Flowers v. Mississippi, 2019) that if a nigger is convicted, then the conviction is not valid unless there were enough niggers on the jury.

How long before our "Conservative" SCOTUS similarly makes it so that a jury containing men cannot convict a wahmen?

Then when a woman is proven to be wrong, I think the group should get the same sentence.

[–] 0 pt

Good! Anytime 3rd wave feminists VOLUNTARILY lose money without me having to left a finger then I am officially FOR IT.

[–] 0 pt

...they lose money to pay for the ability to rape hoax with impunity. Are you for real?

[–] 0 pt

The Euclidean money cuz the actual cases will be decided in favor of truth. Once a judge actually decides to HEAR AND SEE the evidence, truth has a much better chance of winning.

[–] 0 pt

theres a fine line between rape and domination.