WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

468

With the blacks, due to the shared hundreds of years of history, as well as the fact that blacks don’t have any country to go home to, we have different obligations. It’s easy for some anonymous individual with a low IQ or autism to say “we’ll just send them back to Africa! If you say anything else you’re a cuck!”, but people who promote that are living in a deluded fantasy world.

The reality is that the divorce from the blacks is going to be much more complicated, and it is going to require working with black leaders.

Why isn't it as simple as doing like Lincoln did and saying "OK, black leaders, round up your people because you're going back?" If Lincoln hadn't been whacked, the nogs would have been long gone under that plan.

What is this "shared history" that we have with blacks, and why should it be a consideration? Keeping blacks around as we go forward is like a prisoner keeping the ball-and-chain on his ankle after he is released.

Why can't our nogs go back to Africa? The idea that our nigs our different than nigs in the mutha-land is communist propaganda spread by MLK ("We know nothing about Africa..."). Our "chocolate cities" are Africa, and were made so by the blacks, so why won't they quickly assimilate with their black African kin anywhere in black Africa?

>With the blacks, due to the shared hundreds of years of history, as well as the fact that blacks don’t have any country to go home to, we have different obligations. It’s easy for some anonymous individual with a low IQ or autism to say “we’ll just send them back to Africa! If you say anything else you’re a cuck!”, but people who promote that are living in a deluded fantasy world. > The reality is that the divorce from the blacks is going to be much more complicated, and it is going to require working with black leaders. Why isn't it as simple as doing like Lincoln did and saying "OK, black leaders, round up your people because you're going back?" If Lincoln hadn't been whacked, the nogs would have been long gone under that plan. What is this "shared history" that we have with blacks, and why should it be a consideration? Keeping blacks around as we go forward is like a prisoner keeping the ball-and-chain on his ankle after he is released. Why can't our nogs go back to Africa? The idea that our nigs our different than nigs in the mutha-land is communist propaganda spread by MLK ("We know nothing about Africa..."). Our "chocolate cities" are Africa, and were made so by the blacks, so why won't they quickly assimilate with their black African kin anywhere in black Africa?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

there are no gibs in africa so they wouldnt be able to function there

[–] 0 pt

Seems to me that our tax/debt dollars are still going as gibs to Africans-in-Africa, all the food donations, plus shady schiff like Pompeo leveraging hundreds of millions of annual aid dollars to make African countries become faggot countries.

I'd even be somewhat on-board with giving "our" blacks gibs after they've been deported to Africa. Paying them to go over there is still saving bigly compared to having them over here.

[–] 0 pt

Nice. Thanks for adding the breakout quote.