AFPAC II: All Speeches and Comments | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

This thing with the blacks – we’re never getting rid of the blacks, folks. We brought them here and they’re always going to be here. The good news is, blacks lived peacefully with whites for hundreds of years, both under slavery and then Jim Crow in America

Why is Andy pulling a Donald Trump and throwing in pandering to blacks in the middle of an otherwise decent speech?

This statement of his is also extremely questionable, as we did not bring the darkies here, and we did not live peacefully with them (eg: Nat Turner) at any time during our (((forced))) cohabitation.

[Malkin] seems to have actual convictions as well. She was very involved in promoting the anti-Moslem wars

And she was anti-Trump years before Trump ever even ran, she is potentially the first neverTrumper. I cannot view her as anything but a brown person who sees that she can gain lots of White attention by saying things that Whites want to hear. If she actually practiced what she preached, she'd go home to the Philippines.

Nick Fuentes is the best leader

Who funds Nick Fuentes, who is the power behind him? Much of the appeal of Trump was that he could believably argue that he was self-funded. After the disasters with the Tom Cotton and Ted Cruz, both of whom rose to the top on other people's money, all to throw us under the bus at their donors' behest, I want to know who pulls Fuentes' strings.

link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Not your hottest take. You missed the point entirely about the blacks and equate it to pandering to them, which is so far off the mark it seems dishonest rather than honestly wrong.

Malkin? Yeah, whatever I guess. The whole point of these conferences is to gain legitimacy and make the public aware, so that people know they don't have to be neocons because the only other option is dem. She was probably the first mainstream figure that fell in line behind Nick and AF, so she'll probably always have a place there.

Fuentes is funded primarily through his show. He's been doing it for years and you can go watch it yourself and see how it works.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

You missed the point entirely about the blacks and equate it to pandering to them

What is it then? Andy has been periodically pandering to the blacks in this way for a while now, and I can never be sure when he's just trolling. Gen X-style humor (yes, Andy is Gen Y, but his humor is more aged) isn't my forte. Again, what he said about our history with blacks was also factually inaccurate.

The whole point of these conferences is to gain legitimacy and make the public aware, so that people know they don't have to be neocons because the only other option is dem.

I am all too familiar with the tactic of using brown people who say conservative things to let White normies think it is OK to join right-wing movements because it breaks their (((conditioning))) about being racist.

However, I am also all too familiar with what happens when White normies then keep listening to these brown right-wingers, as this ultimately cost us South Carolina and Louisiana. These brown conservatives are only useful for getting Whites into the movement, afterwards these Whites have to be referred to White pundits, otherwise they'll follow the brown pied pipers into sheer folly.

Fuentes is funded primarily through his show. He's been doing it for years

Again, we've had myriad politicians claim to be funded by "the people", only to be found to be funneling in money from big donors who call the shots. You're telling me that this entire conference, and all that Fuentes does, is truly funded exclusively by "The generous support of viewers like you", that there is no deep-pocketed backer truly calling the shots? Even Andy admits that The Daily Stormer is in large part funded by one well-heeled spicy memelord who donated 14.88 bitcoin a while back.

I'm also blackpilled as more than a few mainstream right sites that were once thought to run on "d'nations" have subsequently been accused of having been in bed with the feds. A "red flag" is when a right-wing source is still allowed to process credit card donations/paypal and/or is on social media...Nick Fuentes is still allowed on Twitter. How?

> You missed the point entirely about the blacks and equate it to pandering to them What is it then? Andy has been periodically pandering to the blacks in this way for a while now, and I can never be sure when he's just trolling. Gen X-style humor (yes, Andy is Gen Y, but his humor is more aged) isn't my forte. Again, what he said about our history with blacks was also factually inaccurate. > The whole point of these conferences is to gain legitimacy and make the public aware, so that people know they don't have to be neocons because the only other option is dem. I am all too familiar with the tactic of using brown people who say conservative things to let White normies think it is OK to join right-wing movements because it breaks their (((conditioning))) about being racist. However, I am also all too familiar with what happens when White normies then keep listening to these brown right-wingers, as this ultimately cost us South Carolina and Louisiana. These brown conservatives are only useful for getting Whites into the movement, afterwards these Whites have to be referred to White pundits, otherwise they'll follow the brown pied pipers into sheer folly. > Fuentes is funded primarily through his show. He's been doing it for years Again, we've had myriad politicians claim to be funded by "the people", only to be found to be funneling in money from big donors who call the shots. You're telling me that this entire conference, and all that Fuentes does, is truly funded exclusively by "The generous support of viewers like you", that there is no deep-pocketed backer truly calling the shots? Even Andy admits that The Daily Stormer is in large part funded by one well-heeled spicy memelord who donated 14.88 bitcoin a while back. I'm also blackpilled as more than a few mainstream right sites that were once thought to run on "d'nations" have subsequently been accused of having been in bed with the feds. A "red flag" is when a right-wing source is still allowed to process credit card donations/paypal and/or is on social media...Nick Fuentes is still allowed on Twitter. How?

parent
link