Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Realistically, it’s inevitable that at some point in the future, internet service providers are going to ban dailystormer.su, and the only way for many people to access the site will be through Tor. It is best that you just start using Tor now, in preparation for that eventuality. You will also be sure your traffic is private.

>Realistically, it’s inevitable that at some point in the future, internet service providers are going to ban dailystormer.su, and the only way for many people to access the site will be through Tor. It is best that you just start using Tor now, in preparation for that eventuality. You will also be sure your traffic is private.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 1 pt

What makes you so certain DS is controlled op?

The most damning thing I can think of is that the guy who runs the site, Weev, is probably a Jew. That is concerning, for sure.

On the not controlled op side of things, I'd site the fact that they're banned from everywhere and blackballed by everything in a manner similar to Poal. Additionally, the information they provide seems useful. They regularly advise their readers to avoid getting mixed up with Feds or bringing weapons to protests. An aim of theirs seems to be pointing out other controlled ops and diversion tactics targeting conservatives.

Either way, it can't be proven or disproven, so I always reserve some caution. But on the whole they seem to be providing a good service and good information. That would make it a terrible controlled op if it were one, wouldn't it?

(I made a separate comment for this so we could separate the topics into two threads.)

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Controlled opposition would typically call followers to shoot themselves in the foot on a regular basis

Tech isn't anglin's turf, and tech is vast, you can be very knowledgeable in one domain, and completely clueless when it comes to the next, like java, c++, and whatever language have no secret for you, you're totally at ease with those, and at the same time you know nothing about css for instance or javascript, or even computer security in general. There are a lot of guys very knowledgeable for everything server side for instance, and borderline noobs when it comes to client side stuffs, UI design, etc, even image resizing, that's something they can barely handle, because that's not their turf, like not at all, because they almost never NEED to have to deal with those things

So recommending brave could very well be an "honest mistake"

That being said, I don't believe brave is a BAD browser, but what do I know? I don't use it so I can't really tell, I had it at one point and went back to chromium (yeah I know it's made by satan) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brave_(web_browser)

>Brave is a free and open-source web browser developed by Brave Software, Inc. based on the Chromium web browser. It blocks ads and website trackers, and provides a way for users to send cryptocurrency contributions in the form of Basic Attention Tokens to websites and content creators.

All browsers have their downsides, some are top secure, but slow/not super responsive, some are top secure and super fast, but it's maintained by satan and the shitlib army, some are top secure and fast and lightweight, but you can only display text, no css no javascript.... And for some, you just can't be sure of anything, because they aren't open source, so it requires faith...

So, it's lesser of two evil, so at the end of the day, it's still evil