About companies:
>they’ve spent huge amounts of money on marketing an image of progressiveness, including extreme support for man-on-man anal sex, women, black people and mass immigration (the latter makes sense in terms of economics, the others only make sense in terms of selling an image)
accurate. But that's companies, they're allowed to do everything (unlike the government) right?
Exactly. Why would a multinational company be responsible for upholding the rights outlined in any one specific country's constitution?
(post is archived)