Yeah I speak with those I've known in mind, those who integrated entirely into society. While they remain nationalistic toward china, they aren't like those "from abroad just here for the bounty" who have no connection whatsoever with the host nation they are getting involved with.
Yeah generally they're decent people. We take in everyone regardless of whether they're decent or not, and I wish that would end.
People in general will understand too late that, people aren't crates, you don't build a nation by just pilling on people, any people from anywhere. People don't become american or whatever nationality, when they cross the border, they don't magically change and adopt the host nation's values and codes of conduct, moral code for instance
It's like a turtle thrown from a cliff, for a while it looks like it flies, but in reality it's just falling and at some point it crashes
...
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/02/24/aristotle-on-immigration-diversity-and-democracy/
Aristotle is greatly concerned with the preservation of civil peace in the city-state. One of the most common causes of “faction” and civil war, he says, was the unhappy consequences of unassimilated immigration and the consequent diversity. Aristotle’s prose is perfectly clear:
Heterogeneity of stocks may lead to faction – at any rate until they have had time to assimilate. A city cannot be constituted from any chance collection of people, or in any chance period of time. Most of the cities which have admitted settlers, either at the time of their foundation or later, have been troubled by faction. For example, the Achaeans joined with settlers from Troezen in founding Sybaris, but expelled them when their own numbers increased; and this involved their city in a curse. At Thurii the Sybarites quarreled with the other settlers who had joined them in its colonization; they demanded special privileges, on the ground that they were the owners of the territory, and were driven out of the colony. At Byzantium the later settlers were detected in a conspiracy against the original colonists, and were expelled by force; and a similar expulsion befell the exiles from Chios who were admitted to Antissa by the original colonists. At Zancle, on the other hand, the original colonists were themselves expelled by the Samians whom they admitted. At Apollonia, on the Black Sea, factional conflict was caused by the introduction of new settlers; at Syracuse the conferring of civic rights on aliens and mercenaries, at the end of the period of the tyrants, led to sedition and civil war; and at Amphipolis the original citizens, after admitting Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by the colonists they had admitted. (1303A13)
Thus, immigration of different peoples was a common source of conflict, often leading to civil war and concluding with the ethnic cleansing of either the native peoples or the invaders.
...
And the most infuriating part, is that our so called political elites are supposed to know the above... So we are either ruled by incompetents or traitors... Probably both if you ask me
(post is archived)