Eh, I stand corrected.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2019/09/12/daily-stormer-the-vetting-of-weev/
Damn I guess Weev is a Jew.
edit: Still pretty leery on Christians for Truth. They actually do provide some links in their article (pardon I was going off memory since I've seen it recently). is their evidence for the claim the Stormer promotes violence against women. Does that not seem like an ironic article? I'm not very familiar with CfT but they seem to run a good website, so what conclusions do we draw about people who are smart but seem to interpret ironic statements as straightforward?
Christians for Truth
Out of necessity and survival instincts, I dig into everybody and everything I can. The biggest problem I can say (so far) about these guys is that they don't use any references and hence make unvalidatable claims. They seem to correlate well though, as I find other sources in the end for some. Their claim about Daily Stormer people may not be vetted statements so take it with a grain of salt.
That said, if you're in tune with Logos there is something off about Daily Stormer.
Yeah, I don't read them really but I've flipped through their site and it seems like pretty decent articles and opinions. Nothing seems obviously off.
if you're in tune with Logos there is something off about Daily Stormer.
I haven't seen too much to arouse suspicion, but you've got a good instinct. I haven't been reading them daily for too long either.
What I pick up is a sense of "detour" of what matters. Poking fun at things in a way that are far more important to remain serious about. Making the guy who says "I'm going to steal your girlfriend" sound like a bitch in an article is one thing, but when there is a blatant genocidal war on against the population it's not a joke-worthy subject. The joking is a subversive way of disarming the severity of the problem which slows the needed response down and hence gives me a sense of subversion.
That said, it's good information sometimes.
Thanks for the insight into Christians for Truth. I don't follow them or anything, but it is good to know they may have a vendeta against Daily Stormer.
I respect that you looked into this further. I am not sure where I stand on DS/Weev, but given that he's a jew, it raises a lot of questions for me.
Yeah, it is not something I was entirely comfortable with as a possibility, and now that it seems more certain it's a red flag.
the claim the Stormer promotes violence against women
The DS articles on women and the whole situation about feminism have infuriated many traditionalists (like in SF for example) who insist that women have done nothing wrong and we should cherrish them and the usual white knight things.
Ah, and maybe that's what it is. Maybe they're just mad.
But even so, couching that white knight position in traditionalism and arguing women need to first be respected in order to become creatures worthy of respect -- that's at least a position. That's a position that could win a lot of people over, actually, if argued well.
This other tactic, interpreting humor as serious statements, is just BS.
I think these two things (misinterpretation of humor and the absurd idea that white women should never be criticized) come hand in hand. It's like blind idealism bordering on self destruction.
Too many people are stuck in the past and don't want to admit reality and get mad at anyone arguing their preconceived notions. (Something I often notice with SFers)
(post is archived)