Well, here's a question for you:
Let's say by the end of May (when flu season is typically considered over), we measured the total world corona + flu deaths and compared that to flu deaths from a previous year...
If they were comparable, would that change your mind about the severity of this supposedly new virus? Or would you chalk that up to the tremendous economy destroying isolation measures we've taken?
If it ends up being a lot more deaths than say 2017-2018's flu deaths I'd be prepared to admit I was wrong.
Again false equivalency
Here's another one; In france for instance you get 70,000 tobacco related death a year, on average, conservative estimate https://tobaccoatlas.org/country/france/
Did we stop the economy for that? Why?
It's not a false equivalency because the claim being evaluated is that this IS the flu. No A flu. THE flu.
It's possible that it's something different, but it would be important to look at some data to make that determination. Do you see what I'm saying?
No, you're confusing coronavirus with coronavirus
Feline with feline
feline https://i.postimg.cc/mkYCTRJm/o-CAT-ATTACK-facebook.jpg
Feline https://i.postimg.cc/1t0b11WH/hqdefault.jpg
Size matters, eye trick intended...
Keywords:infection rate
(post is archived)