Oh, I quite agree. But the point is that Ted opposed technological advancement. There are only two paths for mankind: advance or decline. Had he lived in a culture without technology, he'd have clawed his way out of it. All of his bad ideas were picked up at university, taught by tenured, comfortably secured professors. Imagine if he had gone to a community college and become an auto mechanic in his youth. What a happier man he would have been.
Oh, I quite agree. But the point is that Ted opposed technological advancement. There are only two paths for mankind: advance or decline. Had he lived in a culture without technology, he'd have clawed his way out of it. All of his bad ideas were picked up at university, taught by tenured, comfortably secured professors. Imagine if he had gone to a community college and become an auto mechanic in his youth. What a happier man he would have been.
>But the point is that Ted opposed technological advancement. There are only two paths for mankind: advance or decline
Technological advancement... Never occurred to you that, it could very well happen at the expense of... Everything else?
"Science without conscience is the ruin of soul"
>>But the point is that Ted opposed **technological advancement**. There are only two paths for mankind: **advance or decline**
Technological advancement... Never occurred to you that, it could very well happen at the expense of... Everything else?
"Science without conscience is the ruin of soul"
![[Pic8 Webshot]](https://pic8.co/sh/O2SJYn.jpg){kind=link}
![[Pic8 Webshot]](https://pic8.co/sh/fwjGWj.jpg){kind=link}
![[Pic8 Webshot]](https://pic8.co/sh/pDJxDg.jpg){kind=link}
(post is archived)