WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

440

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Oh, I see.

The gun-crowd which goes protesting is made up of overweight men with bitchtits, waving LGBTQEOINJHJEW-flags.

The thing is, that hard times lie ahead, and hard times create hard men. Hard men need weapons. The trenches within society are growing deeper, and at some point they'll be filled.

The other thing is that, at least I and 7e6, don't believe in protesting and such. We're more into creating No-Go-Areas, from which people get removed if they don't fit in. It's all explained here:

https://helicoptarianconstitocracy.org/constitution.html

As a personal remark: I think, this document needs some overhauling, but I'm a perfectionist, and you'll get the idea.

Edit:

If you'd go 30 years into the past, and look, what was crawling around in the middle east, you wouldn't have considered those people to be able of creating something like ISIS. If you'd go further back in time, let's say back to WW2, you wouldn't have found negros capable of winning against the rhodesian military. And yet they did it.

But you're right in that regard, that muh guns won't kill anyone. Guns are lifeless objects, and nothing but tools, which need hands capable of using them.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah that thing about hard times and hard men, that's exactly where the flaw/the dichotomy between theory and practice is, when it comes to armed citizenry

Anglin is right on the fact that, it's a crowd of people equipped for war, but it stops there for the most part

The gun doesn't make the "gunslinger", in a nutshell