WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Archive: https://archive.today/IrIlh

From the post:

>DIY instances are exciting to see, particularly those revolving around the tech industry since they show us the untapped potential of specific products or devices, and in this case, the RISC-V architecture itself. Well, Bitluni's experiment here isn't simple since it involves dealing with multiple superclusters.

Archive: https://archive.today/IrIlh From the post: >>DIY instances are exciting to see, particularly those revolving around the tech industry since they show us the untapped potential of specific products or devices, and in this case, the RISC-V architecture itself. Well, Bitluni's experiment here isn't simple since it involves dealing with multiple superclusters.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

The RISC-V MCU – CH32V203 used in this project as the cores is clocked at 144 MHz but Bitluni overclocked it by three times which is 432 MHz. You can't simply "add up" the individual clock frequencies to say it is running at 14.7 GHz. This is patently wrong and an outright lie. If that were true, my desktop would have a clock frequency of 67.2 GHz. But that's not true...

[–] 1 pt

Yeah, the title is clickbait. I had already posted it before I really read through it.