Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Did they finally decide they want to make money now rather than waste it on people that don't work and are legal liabilities?

Archive: https://archive.today/VYXSj

From the post:

>Goldman Sachs will no longer consider diversity factors when hiring new board members, in the latest high-profile blow to DEI at a major American company. The second-largest investment bank in the United States is set to remove race, gender identity, ethnicity and sexual orientation as criteria to weigh applicants, The Wall Street Journal reported. However, Goldman has not said it would stop considering candidates based on other 'diversity' factors, including viewpoints, background and work and military service, according to people familiar with the matter. It came after the conservative nonprofit National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC), which owns a small stake in the bank, asked executives to strip diversity, equity and inclusion out of hiring protocols in September.

Did they finally decide they want to make money now rather than waste it on people that don't work and are legal liabilities? Archive: https://archive.today/VYXSj From the post: >>Goldman Sachs will no longer consider diversity factors when hiring new board members, in the latest high-profile blow to DEI at a major American company. The second-largest investment bank in the United States is set to remove race, gender identity, ethnicity and sexual orientation as criteria to weigh applicants, The Wall Street Journal reported. However, Goldman has not said it would stop considering candidates based on other 'diversity' factors, including viewpoints, background and work and military service, according to people familiar with the matter. It came after the conservative nonprofit National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC), which owns a small stake in the bank, asked executives to strip diversity, equity and inclusion out of hiring protocols in September.
You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] • 1 pt

It is now that they are not getting tax breaks and free grants for hiring them.

Remember. Shit like US-A.I.D. and "ESG" were giving companies money to hire DEI/Troons/etc. Now that most of that is gone... No more free money for the brain washing. The company was skimming at least 50% or more off the top to hire those useless fucks. Now the money is gone so they are firing them all.

[–] • 1 pt

I'm sure they were getting kickbacks for hiring Trooniqua, but was it more than the losses they experienced from having board members with no actual qualifications? (((Goldman Sachs))) isn't doing this because it's morally correct, someone somewhere was losing shekels, and that was making someone mad.

[–] • 1 pt

Well, They are NOW loosing the shekels. Before, you and I were paying for the sub-structure that was giving them that for free. It's still happening. Just not at as large scale as it was. The more the tree is getting cut down, the more of them are fleeing it.