Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

985

OOAT is taking another blow. "The Out Of Africa" Theory will again need to go under revision in the face of new evidence. When the truth will finally be acknowledged, that Earth's races has its own origins, is still a ways out.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/crystals-found-in-kalahari-desert-challenge-assumptions-about-where-in-africa-human-culture-arose-180977398/

OOAT is taking another blow. "The Out Of Africa" Theory will again need to go under revision in the face of new evidence. When the truth will finally be acknowledged, that Earth's races has its own origins, is still a ways out. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/crystals-found-in-kalahari-desert-challenge-assumptions-about-where-in-africa-human-culture-arose-180977398/

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Literary every great civilization outside of Asia was Aryan. Without further exception.

Also OOA is purely wrong. Whites came from Europe, completely distinct from groids

[–] • 0 pt

completely distinct from groids

True.

Whites came from Europe

I'm not so sure anymore. Once you accept OOA for the bullshit that it is, you open yourself up to A LOT of other possibilities. I don't claim that you are wrong, or that I have a correct alternative, but just that I'm open to a lot more possibilities than whites "coming from" Europe.

For instance, have you looked into the Ainu people of what we call Japan? They are white, and where the inhabitants of that island before Asians. The bible describes Noah as pale skinned with red hair...etc. etc. My only point being that I'm open to a lot of possibilities as to where white people come from, Europe being one of those options.

[–] • 0 pt

Whites are 100 percent distinct from niggers. Whites are from Europe.

This is a years old jew lie (((you're))) pushing under the hopes the nose wasn't showing along with the jew lie.

[–] • 0 pt

You didn't actually respond to anything I actually said and called me a jew...Mosad confirmed...have a nice day.

(Btw...why are our names fucked up...?)

[–] • -1 pt

Hmmm, here's a problem: Whites didn't acquire blue eyes until relatively late in our development. Specifically after we had invaded europe and mixed with the neolithic people here (darkish skin, blue eyes).

Certainly in the time of ancient sumer aryans weren't blue eyed.

[–] • 0 pt

Fuck off kike.

Europe was a White continent with no part groids.

But muh (((Cheddar man)))

Whose DNA was not dark skin. But (((your))) nose shows.

[–] • -1 pt

Europe was a White continent with no part groids.

Dark skin does not equal groid. The neolithic europeans had darker skin than the average modern european. They still live on in places like Sardinia, the Basque countries and maybe the Canary islands.

Whose DNA was not dark skin. But (((your))) nose shows.

Cheddar man's skin was most likely dark, that does not make him an african. Survive the jive (youtube.com) did a good summary of the story.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

The yamnaya took over central europe ppl think around 3000 bc. They replaced roughly half the DNA in the region.

Sumer is dated to around 4900-1800bc.

These are estimates. But certainly there would have been blue eyed aryans running around the area during summerian civilizations accepted period of dating.

Given that their own statues show all their kings as having blue eyes, I would say it's almost certain they did and anyone making a claim they did not needs to provide substantial evidence that the sumerians themselves were wrong before we accept it

[–] • 0 pt

The yamnaya took over central europe ppl think around 3000 bc. They replaced roughly half the DNA in the region.

Sumer is dated to around 4900-1800bc.

Oh interesting, that's more of an overlap than I realised. Still, it does make it difficult for blue eyed white skinned aryans to be the founding dynasty of sumer. I am aware the founders of sumerian civilisation came from abroad, but they're recorded as coming from the south, which would also make it tricky for aryans to fit into the picture.

Given that their own statues show all their kings as having blue eyes, I would say it's almost certain they did and anyone making a claim they did not needs to provide substantial evidence that the sumerians themselves were wrong before we accept it

I disagree, stylised art conventions are a thing, like pharoes being depicted with golden skin.

Here's another possibility though: We know that before the yamna the early european farmers expanded into europe from anatolia. Maybe originally that group came from the fertile crescent and the same people who gave blue eyes to the kings of sumer also ultimately gave them to the aryans.