WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

424

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

Niggers are exempt. Same as kikes who told outrageous lies in court about the holyhoax.

[–] 1 pt

Because that case was closed. It was decided that he was an idiot and the only person provably harmed by his lies was him.

The more recent court case was a separate matter, about him wasting police time. If they had tried to drag in the perjury it would have been regarded as an attempt to try him twice for the same crime.

[–] 1 pt

Cuz he dindu nuffin man. Sheeeeeiit.

[–] 1 pt

It's exceptionally rare to charge a convicted defendant with perjury. It's all wrapped up in his overall conviction.

Charging someone with perjury for losing their case is bitch shit that caused us to shoot the redcoats.

[–] 1 pt

Because perjury is a provable lie. A provable lie isn't legally the same as a conviction. If I say "I have never met this man" and then they can show texts and video of us hanging out etc thats perjury. It's a provable lie. A conviction means the prosecution convinced the jury that the charges are justified. There is a distinct legal difference

[–] 0 pt

I'm not even sure perjury is worth pursuing in most cases.

[–] 0 pt

He's not smart enough to form criminal intent.

His last lawyer could have won with that too.

[–] 0 pt

Jewish-owned paid actor.

[–] 0 pt

Controlled prosecutors if you believe the known liars on the right.

Load more (1 reply)