WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

543

This is akin to worrying about being struck by a meteorite when the Stasi have a listening post in your front yard. One is mind-boggling improbable, the other is certain doom.

This is akin to worrying about being struck by a meteorite when the Stasi have a listening post in your front yard. One is mind-boggling improbable, the other is certain doom.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I'm not worried about 51% attacks. I'm worried about jew financed blockstream attacks.

MIT Digital currency group (which was funded by Epstein) funded Blockstream, along with a bunch of (((transnational corporations))).

They usurped the Bitcoin repo and refused to allow the block size limit of Bitcoin to be raised, limiting it to 5 transactions per second.

This is how they sabotaged Bitcoin. They made it permanently small, so it could never compete with fiat currencies.

They they publicized countless "alternative coins", so the network effect was divided between a thousand different options. Bitcoin Cash was supposed to be the "purist" version of Bitcoin, but that was compromised as well. The developer who started that fork was a jew plant who later tried to divide Bitcoin Cash.

This prevented the top crypto from being a threat, and dispersed the network effect into 1,000 competing alt-coins, many of which were also controlled by big jew.

There is something here that's a threat to global jewry though. What is needed is a scaling privacy coin that everyone uses and isn't secretly controlled by big jew.