Pulse chain
Forking ETH is a simple thing to do. Between news of 2.0 and scaling solutions currently innovating, there's no reason to airdrop to a new chain when ETH already has the first-mover. That website is filled with grammatical errors, buzzwords and a clear lack of understanding of their audience... not to mention no whitepaper.
Do you want my unsolicited "advice"? Return to the research.
You're right it isn't difficult. So why are we waiting for 2nd gen eth still?
The entire system state of ethereum has never been copied and brought onto a new chain. It will have cheaper fees and higher throughput, just like what eth was supposed to already have done, but the pulse devs are doing it in a few months as opposed to half a decade. Apparently, switching eth to a fee burning, pos network isn't as hard to pull off as eth devs make it out to be.
I don't think you're comprehending what a massive event this is. I mean you can sit back, criticize the grammar and marketing on the website, not participate and watch it happen while you wait for eth 2.0 in a couple of years, while pulse takes a % of eth's market share if you really want to.
E: Who gives a shit about a white paper? 100% unnecessary waste of time. Hex has no whitepaper and it's up 1500x.
HEX is run by a hypebeast if I remember correctly, who already had a name for himself. Whitepaper are standard practice. ETH has first mover and there's plenty of scaling solutions picking up steam as we speak. Besides, ETH has already been forked plenty of times. You seem very confident about this, but I don't see anything to invest in. I'm going to instead not hold my breath and make money during this process so that even if some fork does well it'll hardly affect me.
I don't really see how Pulse is a solution.
(post is archived)