![White PRIVILEGE fo rish kids [814x953 - 517KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/3Jvcme.jpg){kind=link}
i know nothing about this, was it really 110 for involuntary manslaughter? that seems a bit weird.
for the other guy, he should be getting whatever is normal for manslaughter, and since he is rich he should give a substantial amount of his wealth to the victims. I realize that it isn't his money at this point, but the court could do something like garnish his inheritance.
Fuck this bullshit narrative. You and OP are both(from the title) saying that this outcome is racist. This is classist you goyim. The more money you throw at a jury, the better the outcome. Did you see if your non-rich guy had his own team of attorney's? OJ proved my theory exactly. Our legal system is fucked, in case you missed that lesson from Poal. I agree in a theoretical "even" world they both would have similar sentences. I still think judges should have some leniency in sentencing for certain things, like public shaming that they don't seem to do anymore.
I never said it was racist. I said it was bullshit. What’s up with you guys not reading what I write and just jumping to conclusions?
You write about White vs. latino racial outcomes in criminal sentences and somehow you are not complaining about racism?
I didn't say anything about race or class, i was just asking if op's narrative was true, because something isn't right about the story.
Should have been 5-7 years MAX on each count and maybe even run concurrently. Unless he was here illegally in which case they should augment the charges but it shouldn’t be 110 years. That’s like a sentence you give to a serial killer or a baby rapist.
(post is archived)