Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

610

This is just fucking stupid. At what point do you not just go to the local MOB boss and ask them for some "protection". You should be able to remove these pieces of shit with force and if they fight back, deadly force.

Everyone talks about "oh but there is insurance, nothing is worth someone's life". Yeah. Actually. My property IS MY FUCKING LIFE you scum. I had to work hard, invest and get somewhat lucky to have what I have. I spent my LIFE working for it. My property IS MY LIFE. You do not get to just take it because you are a entitled piece of shit communist.

Any of you fucks that think you should just be able to take over property should probably take a long walk off a short cliff. You are stealing someone's life. It is not just "given" you morons.

Archive: https://archive.today/3h2Kk

From the post:

>A pair of squatters trying to game New York's 'insane' housing laws are attempting to beat the homeowners in court by using a $25 receipt from Shake Shack to prove they should be protected under the rules. In a DailyMail.com exclusive, we told the story of Denis Kurlyand and Juliya Fulmanof, a married couple who invested $530,000 in a property in Jamaica, Queens, several years ago now forced to go to court with the brazen would-be tenants. On March 5, a broker they were working with visited the property for a site check before allowing tenants to move in and found the locks had been changed.

This is just fucking stupid. At what point do you not just go to the local MOB boss and ask them for some "protection". You should be able to remove these pieces of shit with force and if they fight back, deadly force. Everyone talks about "oh but there is insurance, nothing is worth someone's life". Yeah. Actually. My property IS MY FUCKING LIFE you scum. I had to work hard, invest and get somewhat lucky to have what I have. I spent my LIFE working for it. My property IS MY LIFE. You do not get to just take it because you are a entitled piece of shit communist. Any of you fucks that think you should just be able to take over property should probably take a long walk off a short cliff. You are stealing someone's life. It is not just "given" you morons. Archive: https://archive.today/3h2Kk From the post: >>A pair of squatters trying to game New York's 'insane' housing laws are attempting to beat the homeowners in court by using a $25 receipt from Shake Shack to prove they should be protected under the rules. In a DailyMail.com exclusive, we told the story of Denis Kurlyand and Juliya Fulmanof, a married couple who invested $530,000 in a property in Jamaica, Queens, several years ago now forced to go to court with the brazen would-be tenants. On March 5, a broker they were working with visited the property for a site check before allowing tenants to move in and found the locks had been changed.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] • 3 pts

Now that Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street own 10's of thousands of homes, isn't it interesting that the media is all about changing tenant laws to benefit the landlord. Squatters are all of a sudden everywhere.

[–] • 2 pts

How did a bunch of homeless people all learn a loophole in laws all at once? If I had to guess, it would be that Blackrock paid all of these people to do this, and told them what to say, in order to create a big enough problem in order to pass laws to get rid of the squatters, and at the same time, give even more rights to landlords while taking away protections for tenants.

[–] • 1 pt

Yea, there are literally 'how to ' clips on tiktoc and other social media explaining in detail exactly how to game the system.

[–] • 1 pt

With a side benefit of buying the rental properties that Mom and Pop landlords can no longer risk owning because squatters could financially devastate them.

[–] • 1 pt

Drill deep enough into any societal problem and you'll find a hook nose or two.

[–] • 1 pt

It should be fucking illegal for companies like that to own so many "single family homes".

Not only that, a lot of states (Colorado included) are trying to get rid of "related occupant" laws so they can rent them out to 20 un-related people at a time.