I wouldn't count this as vigilante justice, as that normally implies a third-party being involved.
This case however, she was justified in her actions, he might have not being a threat at that exact moment, but was/would've been had he woken up.
If anyone was justified in killing him, it would be her.
I wouldn't count this as vigilante justice, as that normally implies a third-party being involved.
This case however, she was justified in her actions, he might have not being a threat at that exact moment, but was/would've been had he woken up.
If anyone was justified in killing him, it would be her.
(post is archived)