If they saw him exit the house, but he has not forced his way in or gained entry through inconventional means, then it is not a burglary. If he enters conventionally and then leaves the site without breaking and entering, but has items, it is either petty larceny or grand larceny. If he just walks out with nothing in hand, then that may be a criminal trespass, but in most jurisdictions, you would need prominent anti-trespassing signage believe it or not. That is how a a couple of these stupid police auditors get to walk around wherever they want and evade arrest.
IIRC the house was in construction/renovation and no one lived there.
The jogger went in to try and grab some tools he could resell for cash.
That wasn't the first time the neighborhood was visited by joggers.
Yes, I know all of that, but if I'm correct they had to personally witness him committing a crime. You can't snatch people up off of hearsay.
Construction/Renovation site closed/locked.
Jogger finds a way to get in, can't find anything worth carrying, comes out empty handed.
Neighbors who already have been experiencing visits from joggers see one coming out of the house (no car parked in front that could have tipped them he could have been a worker).
Jogger runs away when realizing he's been spotted.
If they saw him exit the house, but he has not forced his way in or gained entry through inconventional means, then it is not a burglary
It would be trespassing.
Most likely, but not a guarantee since it is not an occupied domicile and may not have had signage prominently posted. I'm pretty sure it would be different if it were an occupied home with people residing in it.
It's still trespassing if you go onto private property regardless of whether there is a prominent sign or not.
(post is archived)