Yup, i've had this 'debate' with others of the 'forced' crowd. He was coerced and gaslit into complete disregard for his own personal agency with all too familiar consequences. And just like the others i've seen, they just cant seem to acknowledge the subtle but diametric distinction between meanings. I usually blame either dumbed down common core/ public schooling or Engrish as a second language. One implies zero blame - the other just naivety, ignorance and failure of self. Imagine if you will going into work today and they tell you - 'Once a month for the next half year. drink this indeterminate poison. Or pack your bags' - Waaaah , i was forced. EDIT: Would rather be homeless and broke than still have a job only to find i have an incurable disease/ illness that best guess means i'm dead in <5 yrs. Good luck providing for the family/ dependents now. RIP to the lemmings .... EDIT2: >he wasn't forced to make a choice. Oh lmao, this is this where you switch tact and imply you meant 'he was forced to make a choice', entirely distinct and separate from your earlier comment ' forced to keep his job '. Because he wasnt 'forced to keep his job' either, no one was. Makes conscious decision to acquiesce personal sovereignty - Words have meanings. joos/ retards and shabbos goy continually conflate/ confuse/ obfuscate empirical truth as a vector for dismantling European hegemony.