v. forced ◊ forcing ◊ forces <fOrs> 1. To do forcibly; exert force; "Don't force it!" 2. To impose
He was forced into taking it because it was "lose your successful career" if you don't take it.
It was a stupid choice nonetheless.
You didn't prove anything. "Impose" is just a synonym.
He wasn't given good choices but he was still given choices. We saw "lose a successful career" but a career isn't something you can have. It wasn't "forcibly" taken away from him because it's not a physical thing. No one pointed a gun at him, no one held a knife to his throat. This is what the word "force" means.
I'm not going to keep going around and around about this. Words have fixed meanings, and when you use them vaguely, you come to all sorts of strange and wrong conclusions.
No wonder no one understands what "rights" are. They can't even get simple concepts like "force" right, so how are they going to understand natural rights?
You didn't prove anything. "Impose" is just a synonym.
lol ok You want to pull an Anticlutch. Let's go.
v. imposed ◊ imposing ◊ imposes <im'pOz> 1. To force oneself upon others, especially as a guest. 2. To lay as a charge, obligation, penalty, etc.; "to impose a toll or fine." 3. To lay on, as the hands, in the religious rites of confirmation and ordination.
See, forcing also means imposing, and he was forced to take a decision.
Do you ever get tired of arguing with brick walls?
He was not "obliged" to do anything. That would mean he had a duty to take the jab and keep his job. He did not. He was fully able to quit the job at any time. It's called at-will employment. Even if he was under contract, adding the jab as a requirement would be a modification of the contract's terms and therefore likely unenforceable.
I don't know why you keep going on about this. You're just wrong. I don't know what "pulling an Anticlutch" means because I don't follow this board that closely. All I remember about that guy's posts is that he usually says stupid inane shit that doesn't make any sense.
Let me add that if he were "obliged", that would mean he had a positive obligation to remain in the job. He had no such obligation. Hence, at-will employment.
Engrish is hard, I know.
(post is archived)