The seemingly completely random, 'out of thin air' things they've been choosing to pass the blame off of the toxic injections is horrible, not unexpected, and also a little interesting. I am sure it isn't just whatever random thing pops into their heads at the time they are writing an article that is the new scapegoat. I expect there are meetings, calls, and people whose jobs it is to analyze what subjects/tasks can and cannot be blamed due to countering an existing narrative. They won't say 'brushing your teeth is causing heart attacks' as they want people to use that fluoride paste. But they might say 'brushing your teeth with natural or homemade toothpaste' can cause it and turn one thing from being on the bad list of going against a narrative to supporting it and being usable instead. I wouldn't be surprised to see a file or site that they all need to check with or a big board on their walls saying what things are good to use and what ones are bad.