that's the same logical explanation I keep arriving at.
if you're trying to help your country and the world, literally every leader has failed miserably and is batting a combined 0/10,000. but if on the other hand, this was all a long term, coordinated effort that involves globalist plants throughout world governments with a goal of destroying independent middle classes all over the world to bring everyone to poverty conditions to justify bringing in a one world government, well then they're batting 10,000 / 10,000.
The logical outcome is that they're really good at being bad.
right. but is it all accidental or intentional? are they in good faith trying and come up short or lying outright about their true agenda?
What's the difference, if accidental, then it means incompetence, if intentional, it still requires planning, thus their skill is incompetence. Either way we keep coming back to being good at being incompetent.
(post is archived)