Well if he's spreading misinformation like that, even if it's factually correct misinformation, then he's obviously not a scientist. The science is settled. We're all in this together.
lol Did you get the jab?
factually correct misinformation
I see what you did there!
People really aren't registering your sarcasm lol
It's conveniently beneficial to not understand sarcasm online.
And here I thought I was playing it too hard.
Thats what your dad told you.
And you went blind.
factually correct misinformation
what the fuck, factually correct mean its fucking FACTS
it literally cant be mis-information, if the information is correct.
Technically misinformation doesn’t mean it’s not truth or fact. It simply means information contrary to the narrative of the current regime.
It was a big meme around the election fraud last year. People bringing up fraudulent ballots, faked info, mail-in ballots that were obviously not mailed, and multiple counts per ballot were decried for spreading "factually correct misinformation" (or something close to that phrase - I can't find a citation, but it might have been memory-holed).
Edit: something like this, pardon the link to faux news https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-columnist-accurate-stories-right-wing-misinformation
tHe sCiEnCe! Is magic!
Lol
(post is archived)