And he got his license revoked for telling the truth about the kill shots. There will be a karmic reckoning at some point that will be apocalyptic, and I want a front row seat.
Front row seat... https://youtu.be/EkTeZLiNCoM?t=188
And he got his license revoked for telling the truth about the kill shots. There will be a karmic reckoning at some point that will be apocalyptic, and I want a front row seat.
Front row seat... https://youtu.be/EkTeZLiNCoM?t=188
is here again deflecting against anyone opposed to the mRNA gene based therapy (which he continually and openly denied for over a year was a Gene based therapy and still does, with copious copy pastes of pages and pages of shill Mainstream factchecker sites).
Notice how he objects to a Doctor that believes in protecting Patient Confidentiality and personal Patient information that would identify them.
seems to believe their is zero benefit to be gained from supplementing Fish oil and Phospholipids when Medical literature is clear on the benefit of both.
Dude is clearly still a vax shill, who has attempted to change tack and appear more discreet is his criticisms lmao ...
vid8: https://vid8.poal.co/user/webrustler/cV64qTz Website: https://www.doctorsandscience.com/presentations.html
Study published 2020, November: https://ipaknowledge.org/ipak-vaxxed-v-unvaxxed-study.php https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/htm Correction 2021, January: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/936/htm Retraction 2021, July: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7754/htm
The journal retracts the article “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses along the Axis of Vaccination” cited above. Following publication, concerns were brought to the attention of the editorial office regarding the validity of the conclusions of the published research. Adhering to our complaints procedure, an investigation was conducted that raised several methodological issues and confirmed that the conclusions were not supported by strong scientific data. The article is therefore retracted. This retraction is approved by the Editor in Chief of the journal. The authors did not agree to this retraction.
They don't go into what these supposed "methodological issues" are. Make of that what you will.
This guy made the news because he won't share his underlying patient data with the investigators and is in contempt of a lawful and legal court order to turn over that patient data.
His excuse?
In court records, he said he had no records related to the second study and that revealing patient names and birthdates would be unethical. Documents filed by Thomas’ attorneys accuse the medical board of overstepping its authority in a “frontal assault” to “destroy” his medical practice.
Dude is a quack. He recommended one of his patients to a homeopath, told them to take fish oil,
a referral to a homeopath, recommendation of fish oil supplements, and [phosphatidylserine]."
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/93566
Don't be fooled by this charlatan. He has his own vaccine schedule that he recommends.
(post is archived)