Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

COVID spike protein causing microcoltting is causing clotting, even in the absence of platelets in the blood.

Paper is nominally dealing with COVID-19 infection, but since the jab produces the spike protein, there is no reason to presume that the jab doesn't have the same effect. But the age profile would be inverted, i.e. the natural infection hits the elderly and those with compromised immune system as their body is unable to fight it, but in healthy people, the jab uses the superior and more active metabolism of the young and healthy to produce vastly more spike protein than in older people. This is why mRNA vaccines/treatments are not suitable for wide use, the amount of the "therapeutic" that is delivered is dependent on the metabolism of the cells that it happens to get into. Get it into the wrong cells, or in a patient with a higher metabolism and you get problems. This, I think, is why the adverse reaction profile for the jabs is exponentially higher in the young, while the mortality is exponentially higher for the elderly and infirm.

This is not something that is obscure or difficult to figure out. This research should have been done even prior to phase I trials, this should never have left the drawing board. The only conclusion is that it is all deliberate, the converse conclusion requires a chain of errors and coincidences that have a vanishingly small probability of occurring.

COVID spike protein causing microcoltting is causing clotting, even in the absence of platelets in the blood. Paper is nominally dealing with COVID-19 infection, but since the jab produces the spike protein, there is no reason to presume that the jab doesn't have the same effect. But the age profile would be inverted, i.e. the natural infection hits the elderly and those with compromised immune system as their body is unable to fight it, but in healthy people, the jab uses the superior and more active metabolism of the young and healthy to produce vastly more spike protein than in older people. This is why mRNA vaccines/treatments are not suitable for wide use, the amount of the "therapeutic" that is delivered is dependent on the metabolism of the cells that it happens to get into. Get it into the wrong cells, or in a patient with a higher metabolism and you get problems. This, I think, is why the adverse reaction profile for the jabs is exponentially higher in the young, while the mortality is exponentially higher for the elderly and infirm. This is not something that is obscure or difficult to figure out. This research should have been done even prior to phase I trials, this should never have left the drawing board. The only conclusion is that it is all deliberate, the converse conclusion requires a chain of errors and coincidences that have a vanishingly small probability of occurring.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (3).
[–] • 1 pt

He's infected with pro-jab stupid, or at least pretending to be so that he doesn't get banned (but seems to be VERY pro-jab), but he looks in great detail at the science and none of it looks to be COVID specific, it's all spike protein caused.

The sort of disorders he's talking about are very consistent with jab reaction reports, not so much with actual COVID infection complications, typically the severely ill with COVID are incurring cytokine storms that cause their lungs to flood with fluid and they effectively drown. If actual COVID infection was predominantly causing clotting disorders, then the reports from the ICU would not emphasise the number of people ventilated (which is murder for COVID), but would talk about people being treated for blood clotting disorders, possibly with calls for blood donation from healthy people to help. This is not happening though.