This appears to be the raw number of reports per lot, but it is meaningless if we don't know the size of each lot. If Lot A is twice as large as Lot B, it stands to reason that there would be twice as many reports for Lot A than Lot B.
lot c is the politician version that has 0 adverse issues.
Right, looks like the variation in lot size might even be 600:1!
I had the same question. For what its worth they stated its bad per capita, although I don't have the numbers
It says "Reports per lot." That's not per capita.
Stated elsewhere Not sure who made this chart
(post is archived)