>People handle dangerous substances every day and most of them never have an incident with them. Most of the time is because the concentrations are too low to be a danger to them.
Chronic lead poisoning is caused by repeated low-level exposure to lead over a prolonged period of time. Same deal with arsenic, that's poisoning 101. So your argument is invalid.
>You like people to agree with you that they should be afraid because you get your rocks off from it. You have a fear porn fetish. That's fucking weird, but you brought this on yourself, entirely, by posting this fear porn on a public forum. What could possibly go wrong with that?
That's not even an argument, that's just made up fantasies on your part
Sodium azide is "very acutely poisonous", and that's a fact. And the concentration in those kits is high enough to induce health hazards according to the manufacturer. And that's a fact jack
Chronic lead poisoning is caused by repeated low-level exposure to lead over a prolonged period of time. Same deal with arsenic, that's poisoning 101. So your argument is invalid.
So now you want to back me up on what I said about tetraethyl lead? Talk about moving goal posts.
the concentration in those kits is high enough to induce health hazards according to the manufacturer. And that's a fact jack
Source for this claim? What is the concentration, since you seem to know how much sodium azide there is in the test kit? Post your proof that the amount is over the acute toxicity limit.
Source: the manufacturer
>The Reagent Solution contains a harmful chemical (see table below). If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with copious amounts of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice: https://www.poison.org/contact-us or 1-800-222-1222.
If the concentration isn't high enough to provoke health hazards then you don't need to "flush with copious amounts of water" the part of your skin that went in contact with it
Where does the manufacturer list the amount of sodium azide in the test? Why can't you be bothered to give a real answer besides 'source: the manufacturer'?
California has prop 65 warnings on damned near everything containing any substances that cause harm. Does the test carry a prop 65 warning? Do all the items that have a prop 65 warning actually cause harm when used or is it just a warning to avoid lawsuits? Is the warning on the sodium azide also just a lawsuit avoidance measure? The jews will label anything they want to avoid lawsuits with. Think about that.
(post is archived)