WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I went to my pharmacy and asked for "the one approved by FDA, Comirnaty, I think it is called." She told me, "Yeah, that's the Pfizer one..."

[–] 0 pt

She told me, "Yeah, that's the Pfizer one..."

Exactly. They're using the two interchangeably and they shouldn't be. More of the scam.

[–] 0 pt

Help me understand the differences though. The FDA website makes it sound like a simple rebrand.

[–] 0 pt

The FDA website makes it sound like a simple rebrand.

That is intentional.

By stating that Comirnaty and the EUA shots are "the same thing" they can allow Pfizer to continue to sell the millions of vials of product that have been produced. I've seen multiple claims arguing for and against the legality of using one versus the other. * Comirnaty is a legally different entity * Comirnaty **is not **a legally different entity * Comirnaty is susceptible to liability lawsuits should any harmful side effects occur * Comirnaty is not susceptible to liability lawsuits should any harmful side effects occur

The one thing that is clear is that the product is not available for use in the US, so the point is moot. The FDA has allowed Pfizer to pull a bait-and-switch and heads should roll for it.