Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Medical exemption denials pending...

Also, in a letter from the Chief Mission Officer the spin is that embracing the vaccine is "making known the healing presence of God".

Let Robert Wiebe & Tom Kopfensteiner, the Chief Medical Officer & Chief Mission Officer of VMFH, know your thoughts

<robert.wiebe@commonspirit.org> 415-438-5771

<tom.kopfensteiner@commonspirit.org>

Update: Give the CEO feedback as well if you feel like it: <lloyd.dean@commonspirit.org> 415-438-5706

Medical exemption denials pending... Also, in a letter from the Chief Mission Officer the spin is that embracing the vaccine is "making known the healing presence of God". Let Robert Wiebe & Tom Kopfensteiner, the Chief Medical Officer & Chief Mission Officer of VMFH, know your thoughts robert.wiebe@commonspirit.org 415-438-5771 tom.kopfensteiner@commonspirit.org Update: Give the CEO feedback as well if you feel like it: lloyd.dean@commonspirit.org 415-438-5706

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Political positions and scientifically inaccurate reasons are not considered to meet the standard of a "sincerely held religious belief."

I want to focus on what it is they're saying here. If, according to their reviewers, they conclude that your beliefs are in conflict with science, they will declare that your beliefs can't possibly be sincere.

They're saying that your belief in God is not sincere because it contradicts sience

By their standard they can deny ALL religious exemptions and I have no doubt that that's exactly their plan.

[–] • 2 pts

Yes, that is what it seems they are saying. I cannot describe in words how I feel about that conclusion and any associated implication or precedent...