Political positions and scientifically inaccurate reasons are not considered to meet the standard of a "sincerely held religious belief."
I want to focus on what it is they're saying here. If, according to their reviewers, they conclude that your beliefs are in conflict with science, they will declare that your beliefs can't possibly be sincere.
They're saying that your belief in God is not sincere because it contradicts sience
By their standard they can deny ALL religious exemptions and I have no doubt that that's exactly their plan.
Yes, that is what it seems they are saying. I cannot describe in words how I feel about that conclusion and any associated implication or precedent...
(post is archived)