I did ask a question, who stole the first samples since it "can't be found in the wild?"
Since you can't answer, which is why you are deflecting, here, COVID genome has been found: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32333222/
Asking that question after I asked mine is not the same. You dodged my question and are now telling me I dodged yours. Disingenuous all the way. Now tell me where the genomic sequence is since I asked that first?
If they had the virus isolated, then there would be standard vaccines that use the dead or attenuated virus as the antagonist pathogen to train our immune systems. There is no need for mRNA treatments if you have the isolated virus. There aren't any vaccines that use the virus so there isn't an isolated virus.
The link you provided does not say what method the genomic sequence was derived by. This study () had to use metatranscriptomic methods to derive it since no isolate of the virus had been found. Your article claims it was isolated on January 12, 2020, but my paper was months later. If they had an isolate and the genomic sequence, then there would have been no need to use MTS to derive it. No isolate, no genomic sequence, no real vaccine. The point here is that they aren't trying to isolate something they manufactured. No one stole it. It was used by the parties who created it. Simple as.
Your paper was submitted months later, ever think they weren't aware of the other work?
mRNA is more effective.
I don't think there is any pleasing you at this point.
mRNA is more effective
That's all you needed to say to know where you stand in all this, Microsoft pimp nigger.
(post is archived)