Should put it in a culture of lung tissue and see how it reacts.
Should put it in a culture of lung tissue and see how it reacts.
Except, those images weren't of extracted fibers from the swab. Those images were from 2006.
Except, those images weren't of extracted fibers from the swab. Those images were from 2006.
Why do you think so?
Why do you think so?
Because it says so in the first text. Says nothing about these images taken from a pcr swab, only that it is "like" the nano tech in the swab without actually demonstrating it.
>Look at the incredibly intricate components within a single nanotech fiber like are now being found in PCR test kit swabs and face masks. These photos of a fiber under 5600x magnification were taken in 2006. Imagine where the nanotechnology is now...
Because it says so in the first text. Says nothing about these images taken from a pcr swab, only that it is "like" the nano tech in the swab without actually demonstrating it.
>>Look at the incredibly intricate components within a single nanotech fiber
like are now being found in PCR test kit swabs and face masks.
These photos of a fiber under 5600x magnification were taken in 2006.
Imagine where the nanotechnology is now...
(post is archived)