Right, I just randomly selected something to paste. Good rebuttal. (smirk)
Okay, explain it then and tell me how it pertains to what's in the video. I know what it's saying and how it has nothing to do with the video, but I want to see you try to manipulate it into being related.
Equally good rebuttal, NOT!
Moaaar cocksucker.
>A transformational advance has been made in an alternate lighting source, one that doesn't require a battery or a plug: high-efficient energy transfer between semiconductor quantum rods and luciferase enzymes. Quantum rods and luciferase enzymes are nanomaterials and biomaterials, respectively. When combined correctly, these materials produce bioluminescence--except, instead of coming from a biomaterial, such as a firefly enzyme, the light eminates from a nanomaterial, and is green, orange, red, or near-infrared in color.
NOW come back with a rebuttal. I'm dying to know how you squirm out of this one. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160229153112.htm
It was in response to your nonsensical comment about "nanotech" when clearly, nanobots have been created for drug delivery with the usage of photothermal effect.
>Photothermal effect is a phenomenon associated with electromagnetic radiation. It is produced by the photoexcitation of material, resulting in the production of thermal energy (heat). It is sometimes used during treatment of blood vessel lesions, laser resurfacing, laser hair removal and laser surgery.
And for my bewildered and contradictory opponent, the illumination witnessed in the video is obviously radiating energy, albeit, thermal energy (infrared) is not visible to the naked eye, however the isopropanol is clearly causing a chemical reaction which has not yet been explained.
This is all in response to your pointless strawman. Moreover, because you didn't see "green light" doesn't refute anything. The camera is giving a wonky white balance because it's confusing. Your iPhone (and any camera) adjusts to color temperature. Its literally sees different types of light as different colors. If you use two different types of light in a scene, the camera can't adjust because there are too many options.
What a bullshit response. I knew you were full of shit. You're just pulling more copypasta off of whatever your source article is even though it's about cancer drug delivery by ultrasonic propulsion and thermal release by use of near-IR light. There is no light emission from the nanowires, the cancer drug or the anionic coatings applied to the nanowires to allow the drug payload to attach. It's unrelated to the video and you doubled down on it.
The video is so poor in quality that nothing solid can be surmised from it. We don't know that the solvent used was truly isopropanol/isopropyl alcohol and we also don't know that the plate on which the "experiment" was conducted was clean, sterile and unadulterated. We know nothing of the controls used to ensure this was not manipulated and we don't know the source of the materials. All we see is some poor quality video of orange glow coming from an unknown source at an unknown scale.
I said "green light" because people like you are all about the luciferase in your theories. The white balance on the camera is off, but it does not shift green light into orange light. The camera image sensors don't work that way whether they are CMOS or CCD. Again you are grasping at anything to support your conspiratorial straw man. I'm not defending the jewflu shit or the terrible things TPTB are doing with it, but we don't need to be making shit up to scare people if we have real things to be concerned about.
I don't trust videos like this because they are themselves propaganda disguised as the common person discovering something "real". One only has to look at the "burning snow" videos that were common recently (but have been floating around a long time) to know that they were made to manipulate the minds of people. Same goes for 5G streetlamp tear down videos and other emotionally manipulative fear videos that make people into raving lunatics without understanding that they are being lied to on both sides. Find me a real life chemist who does a controlled experiment on these swabs and shows the results and then I will start to take it more seriously. This video isn't going to sway me.
(post is archived)