Proof this is nefarious on many levels.
Proof this is nefarious on many levels.
>The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg ruled Thursday that compulsory vaccinations are legal and may be necessary in democratic societies. The ruling came following conclusion of a complaint brought to the court by Czech families regarding compulsory jabs for children. "The measures could be regarded as being 'necessary in a democratic society,'" the court judgment read. https://www.dw.com/en/echr-rules-obligatory-vaccination-may-be-necessary/a-57128443
Why in a "democratic society"? Because the commies are already nailed down in China. They have the social credit system. Well lads, gird your loins. The next few years are going to suck balls and I bet the west will be a 3rd world shithole in 5 years. And I love how they use a straw man to argue people's reluctance to take the death serum:
>Anti-vaxxers — people who refuse to receive vaccines, or to vaccinate their children — have spread various conspiracy theories about why governments want to vaccinate their populations.
So, because I don't want to get an experimental mRNA DNA hacking toxic mystery, I'm an anti-vaxxer for Polio, Measles, etc. I also notice the very last sentence in the article is just more plausible deniability. They never do anything without it.
>Although the ruling by the ECHR may have set the precedent that obligatory vaccinations do not contravene the European Convention on Human Rights, this does not mean European countries will force people to be vaccinated.
Just take out "this does not" and what have you got left? Ominous bastards. The west has fallen. It's just a matter of when and what happens next.
>>The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg ruled Thursday that compulsory vaccinations are legal and may be necessary in democratic societies. The ruling came following conclusion of a complaint brought to the court by Czech families regarding compulsory jabs for children. "The measures could be regarded as being 'necessary in a democratic society,'" the court judgment read.
https://www.dw.com/en/echr-rules-obligatory-vaccination-may-be-necessary/a-57128443
Why in a "democratic society"? Because the commies are already nailed down in China. They have the social credit system. Well lads, gird your loins. The next few years are going to suck balls and I bet the west will be a 3rd world shithole in 5 years. And I love how they use a straw man to argue people's reluctance to take the death serum:
>>Anti-vaxxers — people who refuse to receive vaccines, or to vaccinate their children — have spread various conspiracy theories about why governments want to vaccinate their populations.
So, because I don't want to get an experimental mRNA DNA hacking toxic mystery, I'm an anti-vaxxer for Polio, Measles, etc.
I also notice the very last sentence in the article is just more plausible deniability. They never do anything without it.
>>Although the ruling by the ECHR may have set the precedent that obligatory vaccinations do not contravene the European Convention on Human Rights, this does not mean European countries will force people to be vaccinated.
Just take out "this does not" and what have you got left? Ominous bastards. The west has fallen. It's just a matter of when and what happens next.
(post is archived)