If you had actually read Article 3 Section 1, you wouldn't be suggesting what you are suggesting. English is hard, but it isn't that hard. Go read it again. There is nothing that suggests that if your subject to another jurisdiction, which every single one of our founding fathers were, that you could not be eligible for president. "Subject to interpretation" is why the rule of law is dead and the constitution is unenforced. Its why a "frisk" is not a search so cops don't need a warrant. Its also why you pay an income tax on your wages, which is not "income," and why gold and silver are no longer used to pay government debt, despite being specifically named as the ONLY thing allowed by the Constitution for government debt payments.