I started trying to look at the bright side here, but FML look where this goes. Imagine that you are an honest research scientist in a highly censored system. Because they are. You decide that you are not going to get canceled even though you are a thought criminal. You can't just say, "Duh, faggots, it is the vax." Okay, SADS. What the fuck ever. This is a step to generate some interest in tissue necroscopy. This could be slow-walking admission of vax injury, or it could also be the result of concerned and competent people playing the hand they are dealt. There will be detailed investigation of dead heart tissue. They will, probably, find autoimmune and microclot disease. Under no circumstance will they be able to do an A-B test between vaxed and unvaxed, though. They cannot directly implicate the vax with truth, but (((scientists))) will be able to publish that it was covid that did it. >"Best I can do is that it was covid." I suspect that medical research from here on out will basically exclude people who did not inject fake mRNA poison or at least not include this as a variable. You will bear the cost of medical treatment unnecessary for you, but it will be best practice because of vaxtards. We will forever be in danger of getting inappropriate medical care and constantly be steered towards additional treatment risk for unnecessary bullshit.