Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

118

Think about how it would work if natural immunity counted as an exemption to their vax mandates. Given the choice between taking the clotshot and getting Omicron, which would you choose? For me it's a no-brainer--get Omicron. So if push comes to shove some people would choose COVID parties like the chicken pox parties from decades ago. The Omicron variant is mild but not completely without risk. Some people would die and the media would run these stories: so and so dies after participating in a COVID party. Since the narrative is that the vax is safe, it would be a PR disaster for the narrative: because of the vax mandates some people are driven to desperation. The media would paint them as crazies but it would be undeniable that the vax mandates are killing people. Or would the legacy media find a way to spin it to fit the narrative, or just ignore the existence of covid parties altogether? What do you think?

Think about how it would work if natural immunity counted as an exemption to their vax mandates. Given the choice between taking the clotshot and getting Omicron, which would you choose? For me it's a no-brainer--get Omicron. So if push comes to shove some people would choose COVID parties like the chicken pox parties from decades ago. The Omicron variant is mild but not completely without risk. Some people would die and the media would run these stories: so and so dies after participating in a COVID party. Since the narrative is that the vax is safe, it would be a PR disaster for the narrative: because of the vax mandates some people are driven to desperation. The media would paint them as crazies but it would be undeniable that the vax mandates are killing people. Or would the legacy media find a way to spin it to fit the narrative, or just ignore the existence of covid parties altogether? What do you think?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 0 pt

The whole thing is non-sense, this is a war against lies, you could be religious about it or not.

While I do agree with you about natural immunity the bigger issue is pushing any "vaccine". Here is the logic:

There are 2 reasons to have a vaccine program. You could have it to protect vulnerable (narrative for babies and elderly getting the flu shot), or you could have it to reach heard immunity (narrative for mmr, polio, etc). To reach heard immunity you need to satisfy "1-s <= 1-1/r0" where s is the proportion of the population that can not transmit the disease, and r0 is the number of people each infected person gives the disease to.

It is not logical to have any coerced vaccinations in the first case (restrictions on stores, schools, etc. based on status), the people who are worried can get it if they want, and can decide their risk profile. This is what we were originally sold; only the elderly and vulnerable would get the shot and the pandemic would end.

We are currently being emotionally manipulated into the second case, but the equation has never once been satisfied by taking these shots. Therefore the whole thing is BS. There should be no mandates, no child shots, no requirements for anything, etc.