Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

140

This is why they did away with the PCR test. Something big is afoot.

The remarkable fact that 94.4% of the people hospitalized for COVID-like illness didn't have COVID should have been the biggest story. The vaccines could be 100% effective against “COVID,” but if all that means is making someone test negative while they are hospitalized for respiratory failure, it is completely meaningless.

Among those hospitalized for COVID-like illness, those vaccinated were far less likely to test positive for COVID. Calculating “vaccine efficacy” from this, a third shot of one of the mRNA vaccines was 94% effective against “COVID-19–associated hospitalizations” during the delta-dominant period and 90% effective during the omicron-dominant period.

But “efficacy” means that they helped you get a negative PCR test while you were hospitalized for respiratory failure or other symptoms of COVID-like illness.

It seems that the vax works--those vaccinated are much less likely to get COVID--but on the other hand they are hospitalized more for COVID-like non-COVID virus. This looks a lot like ADE. It isn't the COVID virus that's exploiting the vaccine-produced COVID antibodies, but some other virus that's not COVID.

This is why they did away with the PCR test. Something big is afoot. >The remarkable fact that 94.4% of the people hospitalized for COVID-like illness didn't have COVID should have been the biggest story. The vaccines could be 100% effective against “COVID,” but if all that means is making someone test negative while they are hospitalized for respiratory failure, it is completely meaningless. >Among those hospitalized for COVID-like illness, those vaccinated were far less likely to test positive for COVID. Calculating “vaccine efficacy” from this, a third shot of one of the mRNA vaccines was 94% effective against “COVID-19–associated hospitalizations” during the delta-dominant period and 90% effective during the omicron-dominant period. >But “efficacy” means that they helped you get a negative PCR test while you were hospitalized for respiratory failure or other symptoms of COVID-like illness. It seems that the vax works--those vaccinated are much less likely to get COVID--but on the other hand they are hospitalized more for COVID-like non-COVID virus. This looks a lot like ADE. It isn't the COVID virus that's exploiting the vaccine-produced COVID antibodies, but some other virus that's not COVID.

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

This nigger either glows or is retarded. If his data is remotely accurate, he's misinterpreting it. The jab is the coof and the spike protein is killing people. Or he's a glownigger blowing smoke up your ass because there is no coof, it's normal seasonal respiratory illnesses. The jab may make people more susceptible to these illnesses, barring randomized clot shots and graphene oxide injections. Either way he's wrong or lying.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Another one would be COVID was the common cold with a couple of tweaks to get the handful of unique symptoms so that people disassociated the two viruses. After taking the jab now all these tards are getting ADE and dying of the common cold. COVID disappeared like a fart in the wind because it's only purpose was to elicit a response and cause people to inject themselves with the actual weapon then mutate back into a strain of the common cold that cant be differentiated from the wild one.