Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

223

I quote:

BA.2 is considered a sub-lineage of original Omicron (which is now referred to as Omicron BA.1), however these two genetic variants seem to have diverged months BEFORE Omicron actually appeared.

BA.2 has 28 more mutations, than Omicron, with no intermediate variants seen between them.

This is certainly a genetic oddity, just as Omicron is a genetic oddity with the ancestor that disappeared 1.5 years before Omicron appeared. Both of these oddities raise a possibility that both Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 do not have a natural origin. I said that Omicron (now known as BA.1) may be lab-made on December 2.

The idea is that someone took the original covid virus about 1.5 years ago and worked on it in a lab to create a highly contagious but very mild version of the disease--a self-spreading vaccine--and then released it into the wild. The BA.2 variant is an even more successful form of the self-spreading vaccine.

I quote: >BA.2 is considered a sub-lineage of original Omicron (which is now referred to as Omicron BA.1), however these two genetic variants seem to have diverged months BEFORE Omicron actually appeared. >BA.2 has 28 more mutations, than Omicron, with no intermediate variants seen between them. >This is certainly a genetic oddity, just as Omicron is a genetic oddity with the ancestor that disappeared 1.5 years before Omicron appeared. Both of these oddities raise a possibility that both Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 do not have a natural origin. I said that Omicron (now known as BA.1) may be lab-made on December 2. The idea is that someone took the original covid virus about 1.5 years ago and worked on it in a lab to create a highly contagious but very mild version of the disease--a self-spreading vaccine--and then released it into the wild. The BA.2 variant is an even more successful form of the self-spreading vaccine.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (1).
[–] • 1 pt

The spike was the gain of function for the “virus”. Are we just going to forget that colds and flus existed before 2020? I mean...cases, cases, cases, using PCR testing which was never meant for determining who had c19 or not: you can test a goat or a papaya and get a positive PCR result, depending on the amount of cycles you put your sample through to determine your outcome. C19 is a compendium of symptoms, so what? The problem is, do the vaccinated “shed” the spike and cause others to get sick? Do people even know they are being injected with synthetic nucleotides that program their cells to produce toxins which cause multiple adverse reactions, possibly infertility or genetic reprogramming? Do you know?