Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

389

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Denninger came to the same conclusion a while back--that the risk of side effects is EXPONENTIAL with the dose.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

They started off saying you needed a booster every six months. Then I started reading every 5 months and now they are at every 3 months. Shouldn't take to long to kill all the jabbed at that rate!

[–] • 1 pt

How many jabs for 100% risk?

[–] • 1 pt

1, but it might take a few years.

By the time the data is in it's not something you want to gamble with. Not that the data is accurate anyway.

[–] • 1 pt

I meant for immediate 100% risk. By your answer the risk of Myocarditis from three jabs is 300% and yet vaxxed still roam.

[–] • 1 pt

It's a timescale thing more than up to 4000% more death kinda thing.

It might be like getting limescale in a kettle. Once it builds up on the element too much you have to throw it in the bin, but you don't know where the deposits will build up first.

Maybe in the people that die quickly, the shot gets sucked into their heart faster because they have cholesterol smothering the inside of it first, so it clings on easier.

[–] • 1 pt

210 =1024

Don't know the starting point but 10 jabs is 1000x. I'm guessing we'll be at the 10th jab for most working class in 2-3 years

[–] • 1 pt

the first 10 shots were fine, I have no idea why the 11th killed him

some retard doctor

[–] • 1 pt

is there still a placebo control group?