There hasn’t been a legal reason for anything the government or private companies have done.
Roberts is iffy, so you need the other five and we don’t have enough info on 3 of them to know how they’ll side. Thomas and Alito are against mandates but we’ll have to see how the other “conservative” justices break.
There hasn’t been a legal reason for anything the government or private companies have done.
Roberts is iffy, so you need the other five and we don’t have enough info on 3 of them to know how they’ll side. Thomas and Alito are against mandates but we’ll have to see how the other “conservative” justices break.
They’ve slapped Biden repeatedly so far. We shall see.
They’ve slapped Biden repeatedly so far. We shall see.
I hope so to.
This is what someone posted in the live feed, I asked who he’s talking about but haven’t gotten an answer yet.
Looks like it's heading to a 6-3 decision. Bitch, bitch and fag refuse to consider that the jabbed can still transmit covid. The court seems to believe being jabbed makes you safe, but the unjabbed, and only the unjabbed, pose a risk to the other unjabbed.
I hope so to.
This is what someone posted in the live feed, I asked who he’s talking about but haven’t gotten an answer yet.
>Looks like it's heading to a 6-3 decision. Bitch, bitch and fag refuse to consider that the jabbed can still transmit covid. The court seems to believe being jabbed makes you safe, but the unjabbed, and only the unjabbed, pose a risk to the other unjabbed.
(post is archived)