I'm just going to hang and post a few science and general interest links. Does being too stupid to interpret a graph (climate.nasa.gov) mean you feel obliged to protect people from science?
I'm just going to hang and post a few science and general interest links. Does being [too stupid to interpret a graph](https://climate.nasa.gov/system/content_pages/main_images/1309_temp-data-from-science-institutions.jpg) mean you feel obliged to protect people from science?
I'm not going to argue with you anymore. You're a clown. 🤣
https://poal.co/s/Conservation/27421/e71f56ba-d47e-4bdd-a603-0279c76530b5
I'm not going to argue with you anymore. You're a clown. 🤣
https://poal.co/s/Conservation/27421/e71f56ba-d47e-4bdd-a603-0279c76530b5
It's not really an argument when you're a soulless NPC who just spews out the same zero-evidence bullshit. Have another look at what people who can think say about the issue. (climate.nasa.gov)
It's not really an argument when you're a soulless NPC who just spews out the same zero-evidence bullshit. [Have another look at what people who can think say about the issue. ](https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/)
You're a clown, get over it. 🤣
https://poal.co/s/Conservation/27421/e71f56ba-d47e-4bdd-a603-0279c76530b5
You're a clown, get over it. 🤣
https://poal.co/s/Conservation/27421/e71f56ba-d47e-4bdd-a603-0279c76530b5
(post is archived)