WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

843

jewpedia has been shit for a long time. It's time to let it fail and die. I stopped using it as a source so long ago I don't know when it was. Do you remember when teachers/professors said it was not a valid source? Well, they were right.

Fuck them. Burn kikepedia.

We know this is not because of a "DDOS". Archive has been under attack to the point they use kikeflare now too. This is because kikepedia does not like it when they can't edit history at will with zero record of it happening.

Archive: https://archive.today/4yRFt

From the post:

>The English-language edition of Wikipedia is blacklisting Archive.today after the controversial archive site was used to direct a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack against a blog. In the course of discussing whether Archive.today should be deprecated because of the DDoS, Wikipedia editors discovered that the archive site altered snapshots of webpages to insert the name of the blogger who was targeted by the DDoS. The alterations were apparently fueled by a grudge against the blogger over a post that described how the Archive.today maintainer hid their identity behind several aliases.

jewpedia has been shit for a long time. It's time to let it fail and die. I stopped using it as a source so long ago I don't know when it was. Do you remember when teachers/professors said it was not a valid source? Well, they were right. Fuck them. Burn kikepedia. We know this is not because of a "DDOS". Archive has been under attack to the point they use kikeflare now too. This is because kikepedia does not like it when they can't edit history at will with zero record of it happening. Archive: https://archive.today/4yRFt From the post: >>The English-language edition of Wikipedia is blacklisting Archive.today after the controversial archive site was used to direct a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack against a blog. In the course of discussing whether Archive.today should be deprecated because of the DDoS, Wikipedia editors discovered that the archive site altered snapshots of webpages to insert the name of the blogger who was targeted by the DDoS. The alterations were apparently fueled by a grudge against the blogger over a post that described how the Archive.today maintainer hid their identity behind several aliases.
[–] 2 pts

Epstein files gets too much noticing. SHUT IT DOWN.

[–] 1 pt

It wasn't sufficient to eliminate Early Life sections, now (((they))) want any reference to it scrubbed clean too.

[–] 1 pt

Wait a min, don’t I read about a month ago the owner of a blog, was getting traffic from archive and did some investigation on the links.

Anyone remember that?